EDA has played a crucial role
By Pierre Delsaux, Deputy Director General, European Commission (DG GROW)
“Defence matters in a world that is unsettled by increasing international disorder. In response to changing and challenging geopolitics, European leaders decided to join forces to strengthen Europe’s common security and defence. Driven by strong political consensus that Member States can no longer address security challenges on their own, a number of initiatives have been launched at the European Union level for the EU to become a more effective security provider. EDA has played a crucial role in this respect. The Agency has been traditionally the forum where Member States define capability development projects and jointly invest in those projects and in collaborative defence research projects. The expertise of the EDA in both capability development and in defence research has greatly contributed to the EU defence initiatives.
The Commission’s contribution to defence at EU level is the European Defence Fund (EDF) and its two preceding test programmes, the Preparatory Acton on Defence Research (PADR) and the European Defence Industrial Development Programme (EDIDP).
Both the test programmes and the EDF aim at deeper cooperation in the EU in the areas of defence research and development. By funding collaborative projects proposed by consortia formed by entities such as companies and research organisations across the Member States, the Commission intends to support the advantages that new technologies can deliver as a key tool to develop the military instruments.In this context, the military input to capability development is an integrated part of a broader effort, managed by EDA through the Capability Development Plan.The EUMC, supported by the EU Military Staff, regularly provides two out of the four strands used in the Capability Development Process.Technological superiority is a must for European defence and an essential requirement in order to fully achieve the potential of the EU Global Strategy.innovation and competitiveness of the defence industry so that industry can provide the military capabilities that the armed forces in the Member States need. For the PADR, the Commission found a good partner in EDA that has been fulfilling the task of implementing the programme in a complementary and satisfactory way
The ambition of the Commission is high. The EDF, PADR and EDIP can be a real game-changer in how industrial defence cooperation is organised within Europe: big military flagship programmes could be developed within the next decade.
But the PADR, EDIDP and EDF do not exist in isolation. Other important defence initiatives by Member States, like CARD and PESCO, for which EDA is the secretariat also aim at greater defence cooperation. All these initiatives have common goals, namely to make sure that the EU has the defence capabilities it needs. Linkages between these initiatives are important and equally important are the relationships between the respective institutions dealing with the implementation. EDA, with its expertise, could play an important role to help the Member States develop the capabilities they need.
First, the EDF focuses on the supply side of defence capabilities. The Commission will fund projects proposed by industry and research centres that can ‘supply’ a good solution for a defence capability. PESCO and CARD can have a role in streamlining the demand Security and defence are difficult and costly to build and to maintain, but very easy to lose. EDA and the EUMC are both expressions of Member States’ voice, although with different but complementary roles.On the one side, EDA supports the development of defence capabilities, acts as a catalyst, promotes collaboration and introduces solutions to improve defence capabilities.On the other side, the EUMC represents the Chiefs of Defence and through them it ensures that the voice of the military end-users is heard in the EU institutions and that it is incorporated into the decision-making process at all stages and levels of the EU’s CSDP. For this reason, the cooperation between the two entities is paramount in order to ensure coherence in the overall development efforts and to make sure all actors involved are able to play a role in this endeavour”.side of a capability. Member States can align their technical requirements for a specific defence capability within the PESCO and CARD framework, which is a requirement for some EDF actions.
Second, the capability part of the EDF is implemented through a co-financing mechanism. The Commission awards grants -at different percentage rates depending on the stage of the development process- from the EU budget to selected projects. Member States commit to finance the remaining costs. Synchronisation of national budget commitments to capability priorities of the EDF is crucial for projects to kick-off. As this is not easy to achieve, PESCO and CARD can assist to anticipate needed commitments and streamline defence budgetary planning of the Member States.
Third, the EDF focuses on projects where EU added-value can be demonstrated. The EDF’s objective is not to address all the capability gaps identified in the Capability Development Plan (CDP), as this is the responsibility of Member States. As Member States have an important role in the implementation of the Fund, namely in defining the joint defence priorities within the Programme Committee that decides on the work-programme, they may take, for coherence reasons, priorities of the CDP, PESCO or CARD.
In sum, the different defence initiatives all deal with a different aspect of enhanced defence cooperation. But only through consistency and good relations between the defence initiatives and therefore also the European institutions and agencies can we achieve the shared goal, namely the delivery of European military capabilities”.